Board
Relationships with Executive and Staff
General:
Common understanding among the Board, Executive Director
and staff about the goals, policies and practices of the Outward Bound
School makes a significant contribution to the effectiveness of operations.
Only through maintenance of systematic channels of communication within
the organization can the Board ensure its own responsibility for the
school's programs.
The Board:
Has the responsibility to see that regular channels of
communication are set up. These may include:
- Regular scheduled and planned conferences between the Executive
Director and the Chairman and between the Executive Director and other
individuals on the Board (officers, committee chairperson).
- Participation of staff members on appropriate committees.
- Procedures for timely reporting of staff opinions and recommendations
to the Board and Board opinions and decisions to the staff.
- The Board could also consider the possibility of inviting clients,
non board members and non Outward Bound individuals and groups to
Board and committee meetings to explore common concerns.
- Prepared Materials especially prepared manuals can help clarify
the Outward Bound School's purpose, policies, etc. Examples of these
are: a board members handbook and staff operations manual
The Executive Director:
- Perhaps the most important responsibility of the Board is the selection
of the Executive Director. The knowledge, skill and leadership of
the person employed will determine to a significant extent the Outward
Bound School's effectiveness and competence in carrying out its mission.
The Board should establish expectations for the position, qualifications,
salary and other benefits. The qualifications will depend on the size
and scope of the school and its programs. It is of fundamental importance
that the individual be able to impart under- standing and knowledge
to the Board and instill confidence and trust on the part of staff
and Board members.
- A detailed job description is essential, clearly outlining the Executive
Directors scope of authority and responsibilities.
- Thoughtful consideration must be given to the ongoing training
and development of the Executive Director. This should be carried
out systematically seeking areas that would benefit both the school
and the indvidual.
- The Executive Director should have a performance appraisal against
clearly stated objectives during the first six months of tenure and
thereafter annually. All too often this is an area which is neglected.
- Questions relating to the retention of the Executive Director are
usually addressed by a special committee appointed by the President
or Chairman. Her/his committee should meet with the Executive Director
and discuss reasons for considering termination. If, after discussion,
further action seems warranted, several things might be done by the
commitee:
- It may call in a professional consultant
with the Executive Director's full knowledge.
- It may offer the Director a stated
time to improve the situation.
- It may suggest that her/his resignation
be submitted to the Board.
- It may recommend dismissal for cause
to the Board.
Staff:
Most Boards do not include regular staff in direct Board
deliberations. Reasons for this include conflict of interest, limitations
on objectivity, etc. A general practice is for staff to participate
with Board members at the committee level and be invited to attend Board
meetings to make or participate in certain presentations.
- The generally accepted procedure for staff to make their wishes
and expressions of opinion known to the Board is through the Executive
Director. This is a straightforward method in which the Board can
have access to professional staff opinion without undermining sound
administrative principles.
- Board members should not listen to staff members' complaints about
an Executive Director without confirmation that the staff members
have exhausted available channels of communication and have informed
the Executive Director of their intention of taking the dispute to
the Board. This violates professional ethics and usually reflects
a severe problem of internal management communications.
- Under no circumstances should Board members ask staff members for
information about the Executive Director's work. This would place
the Director and staff in untenable positions and would lead to administrative
chaos.
Back
to Board Page
Back
to Licensing Page
|